Why do you say it's limited evidence? Catalhuyuk is one of the most thoroughly excavated sites in the world and has been studied since the 1950s. You don't even know what the evidence is. If you're such a scientist, why do you persist in disregarding the expert opinion of the archeologists, anthropologists, art historians and other scientists who have reached these conclusions by actually examining the data when you have no expertise in that area and know almost nothing about it? And that's just one example of you deciding things that you actually know nothing about. You really are a crackpot! No, we can't just agree to disagree because you don't have anything to back up your postion, and Elle has subject matter experts. Do you see the problem with that, Mr. Science?